Exactly @GamerSeuss
My thoughts about choosing a Coastal Town was, that this test was all about Towns and it's ressources and working Harbors. I wanted to test, how a harbor works, so it was logical to choose such a town.
Next time we maybe choose a totally different place, maybe not even a big town.
All is depending on what the next test is focussing on.
@Nekrage said in Panning Camera:
"Hey guys go north"
It is already a pain to decribe directions, since north/south is not up/down and west/east is not left/right, because the ingame map got turned to the side for 45° to fit the Minimap.
Your example with that wider view, when you mouse out on the edges, is a quite nice one.
Often i get problems to see creatures and if i see them, they already are in aggro range.
At the moment the Legends are such a thing. I was looking for their shadows, just not to step to close to them.
Others did not and just pulled them too early.
I guess such a "spy-mode" would make the overview way better.
Agreeing too.
Not just such message, a Party UI with some more features would be nice.
We had yesterday the problem after our Party Leader left the game, that we could not figuring out, if all people are still online. So an activity/online indicator for group members would be nice. (same for guild 
)
It is an already known Bug: [FRAC-1968] River doesn't have texture
@Stacy555 said in shitty game:
I'm not, it's called sarcasm.
Ahhh for that was the quotation marks.
Almost thought same like Gothix.
Don't do that with us
@Vicious said in Death Penalty of losing all gear and inventory: WORST IDEA EVER!!!:
for ppl with no balls
Hey, Vicious, i am glad i have no balls, at least not in my pants 
As for the other things you said, i sadly need to agree you and welcome back to the forum.
Even as a frightened old girl, i wish to have the fear factor.
And i really can't understand as you can't either, why people cry about Fractured Loot System, that was planned exactly like this from the first day of the idea.
Oh my Goth, what happened with the Fractured followers, if i am forced to agree with you?
The Party System seems to be broken since 2.4.1
Before that patch it was like this:
After the patch:
@Prometheus I know that @Ostaff was traveling to our harbor before the patch, and in our log never was anything about Tax.
Also myself was traveling from Roccandils town to our harbor and tax got payed by me, but never came up in our townhall.
I even counted gold income and it did not raised.
The first entry at our log we got after 2.4.1 patch.
Ohh Harbor Tax works now! Thank you @Prometheus 
Uhm... 2 separate Threads about?
Which one we should use to Test your page?
@Scozzi
@Ramsus
I was thinking about the same as you describe.
To hold a rank consciously would be great, but is also in some kind easy to abuse, if we don't get some downsides if we do so. The Ranksystem is in its child shoes, we got this test the first implemention and it will not be the final version.
The rank system will get a big change in next test. Prometheus said:
"Upkeep now starts after 3 days. The system is going to be radically different in the next test anyway - more info in the roadmap!
That being said, mining city are not meant to be able to rank up (above the first few ranks) unless they buy farming products from farming cities Ideally, a well-populated mining city should actually have no farming plots internally (because it needs all the space for shops and houses and +prestige decorations) and buy all edibles from farming cities."
So i think we will need to wait a bit to be able to evaluate it entirely.
The page look is good.
Maybe give it some more "Fractured Look", means using some Header graphic and the Fractured brownish look?
But it always says:
Filling it with some example data to show something, or if you already did, the search isn't working as intended i think.
Also please add a description/help page about how to use the page features
Some legal note would be great too and a link to the game, to show, where the rights for the content is.
@Extreminador did you rested at our Tavern before and not at another after it?
@Razvan said in INT stat not increasing memory points:
Because this way INT will be the only stat that is less powerful if it comes from additional source.
True. If you watch other stats, like Strength, there is indeed a difference, for example Strenght increases Max Life ingame.
The Problem is, INT is the only one, that effect a core Element of the game, the amount of skills you are able to take to your Preset. No other Stat has so much impact.
It is maybe a thing, that Devs should look into, to separate the Memory Point amount from actual character stats and bind them at a special Stat, that is possible to increase ingame. But i do not have an idea how to handle it better, since it shouldn‘t be a stat you should not be able to increase that easy in reason of the horizontal progression.
Curious about the Blog Post, because i have open questions:
)
@spoletta yes, you are true, that should get need a check, like you can‘t memorize a Talent Preset with less INT, if you have a Ability set memorized, that needs more INT. But thats easier to implement, since both is to set at the same place.
Equipment you can change whenever you want, Memorizing just with resting at Fireplaces.
But directly an edit:
Finally they removed Memory Point increasing by Talents at Patch 2.4.1:
Thank you Prometheus.
I am always appreciating your open words.
You proofed several times now, that you don't hide your mistakes and gives the feedback we need, when it is neccessary.
cross my fingers that you can get work done and satisfying the community.
Don't worry, most of us know, how hard your work is and how much hearth blood you put in it.