Posts made by Finland

@powersalem many threads up with the same questions :p, stand alone for now and I hope so for the future

@kellewic said in I want to get excited but...:

This is the part where I'm still a bit unclear. Each planet has it's own unique resources; not necessarily better, just different. Is there any incentive for other planets to want said resources and thus potentially creating strife or is this really just 3 games with one engine?

Mainly if you want to unluck all the knowledge system you need to travel everywhere. It's one game just with 3 places with 3 different playstyle. Resources are non necessary better, Tartaros prolly will get the most rare resources. Anyway the purpose of invading Arboreus is just to kill people and bring chaos, the resources are just an excuse

@kellewic said in I want to get excited but...:

Immediately burned away? So far there's a 30m time span they can "survive". The threats they face may not be insurmountable - wildlife, plants, whatever. If experience has taught me one thing, developers can never anticipate what their users will do.

They can stay for 30 mins in the pvp areas of Arboreus while debuffed. If they enter safe ares they get burned instant. About Syndesia I don't remer how long they can stay there, prolly h24.

@kellewic said in I want to get excited but...:

Are Demons free to do this at will or strictly depend on eclipses? I remember something about Stargates, but haven't read any specifics on the mechanics yet

Eclips may happen only on Syndesia. Demons can invade also without eclipse and they can do on both Syndesia and Arboreus. The eclips event just remove the debuffs from demons while invadin Syndesia.

@esoba yeah I'm also way more pver and I usually do pvp in battelgrounds cause looks more achieving to me but here defend a guild city or defend innocents from evil intent could be the right purpose to do some pvp 30-50% of the time.

@phaethonas said in I want to get excited but...:

As I've said before. Fractured tries to combine pvp and pve. This means that extreme pvpers (call them gankers or otherwise if you like) have no place at this game. But this also means that, extreme pvers (I call them care-bears) also have no place in this game. If the game tries to cater at either of them, the balance is being lost, and the game will ultimately fail.

I'm wondering if you are joking. Tartaros is for extreme pvpers. The problem is only for carebears. We'll se if they have their spot (they must have one) . Asking to FFA everywere is silly. Extreme pvpers that want kill carebears/ gatheres hahaha I call hem spineless. Ambush stile is spineless attitude ;). An invasion looks more like a war and could be funny but the number will make the difference and unbalance the fight prolly.

If fractured were hosted on two servers, one PvE (flag to pvp everywhere but only flagged can be attacked) and one PvP (ffa everywhere without debuffs and restrincions) I wonder if you would play fractured on the PvP server.

It may take 3-4 years for the game to collapse, Dynamight Studios may have made a profit by then, but from a player's perspective? The game will have failed.

I don't know and we'll see. I'm only sure that making games for pkers (givin hem what they want) is a fail.

@phaethonas only Syndesia and I suppose only human race. I think they just want a firs feedback prolly engine/gameplay related.

@esoba there is a 100% chance demon invading if you read threads around, pkers (demon mostly) care to play fractured just to harass Arboreus ;).

Gatz everyone

@logain you did by talking about PvE but ok. Have a nice day.

@meerkhat nice question . Just be patient the Team is small and it's better have them full time on the game rather on th site/forum

@gothix as far as I know we are not gonna get instanced dungeons/raids just open world thats why we need also pvp off zone cause an open dungeon in a pvp on full loot zone it's just pvp not pve. Every time I must beready tofight players became pvp. But I'm like you I would like to see some dungeons/raids and some instanced battlegrounds or they could try the open world controll the point, escort and so on. I rellylike objectives PvP. FFA is not really for me I need a good purpose to do it like punishing pkers.

@gothix I have never said to remove PvP but you must give non-PvP end game for those who dislike it

@kellewic Sunti is really cool I love his artWorks too. You can find his jobs on ArtStation and on his WebSite

@dat3814606 welcome aboard new friend :hugging:

Chào mừng bạn trên tàu mới :hugging:

@wyze said in Pay to win or pay to play??:

People would not buy a game to play (20$ or so) but would install a free mmo / game and pay 100$ in micro transactions in the first month...

Hahahaha that's true I remeber the onld times when I played wow and my friends where arguing about b2p and p2p (the sub) while they where burning more than 100-200$ on Silkroad.

@wyze welcome aboard new friend :hugging:

@lordsunshine welcome aboard new friend :hugging:

@toxicpulse welcome aboard new friend :hugging: I suppose that everyone somehow is excited/hyped to test the game.

@wyze not everyone care to PvP you have to think to both sides.