Posts made by boogis

@some1justntime there can be two ways i think. first is like in ultima when u play insrtument to tame animals second he just will be a buffer. but i really interested how it will be

@wolfkomodo46 if you will use AOE while on mount then this bunch of enemy players (at least one of them) will dismount you. so i guess all front men will be dismounted and archers and mages on a backline will be on mounts cos they dont contact with enemies. and if someone like you are saying will rush into big crowd of enemies he will de dismounted and stunned and surly killed fast.

about slowing effect - in my opinion maybe using a mount should slow down you cast speed cos you somehow have to justify your horse speed. for example if you on feet then your cast is faster then on horse so you have to choose either you want move faster of cast faster. am I wrong?

about disbalance. i think mounted combat will add more veriety to game combat and add more tactics rather then make a mount just a moving vehicle. Even if they make mount not disapearing and killable then it will add segnificant tactics to a battle. so thats we are all here for to discuss and balance it in our minds

@jetah yes i am ))) but im not ingnoring mounts tax which will add some more value to horse )))

@gothix i suggest to tax all mounts so that you wont have too many )))))

@jetah yeah bro i think you are right from but maybe not higher damage but maybe the same damage. i guess. so players didnt have advanteges being on horse, but if its the same then whats a point to dismount? i dont know.

but besides of dismount technices, which i will help there is also one question im thinking about - what is better? when u on horse you are loosing your horses HP first and then your own (after its killed) ? or you always lose your own first and then after you are dead winner get your horse as a reward? this is very interesting question. when i try to imagine this i dont realy know what is better. cos if you will always lose your own HP there will be fights only on mounts, ONLY .............

hmmmmmmmm...........i dont know.....maybe if you are stronger on a horse then maybe it make sense to dismount to make enemy weaker. BUT... big BUT...once you dismounted enemy can he jump back on horse straght away of there will be cool down? cos if there is CD then ofter dissmaunted you have to focus on his horse so that he never jump back on it and become stronger again. but if there is a coolddown then its kind of unrealistic - why the hell i cant jump back on my horse? maybe just a little cd? (for dismounting to make sense?)

@jetah if you make mounted combat more damage there wont be a point in umounted combat? the point is speed. on mount you can chase anyone unmounted and kill it. so they have to have a chance to escape

@roccandil ok i see, but in my opinion lich has to be evil. all russian people being raised on fact that lich is evil. we have our national lich "koschshey the immortal" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koschei

@gothix ok, but this is a game, if you ask me personaly i dont want to kill anyone at all but this is the game. and my question is how game recognize lich? as a evil? is so that make sense then. you must chooce you side either you are deamon or angel or beast or any other crap - if you are evil then you are evil. besides you misstake bad and evil. angel is not evil he is good but he can be good or bad. demon is evil but he can be good or bad. so no one is racist here ok?)))))

@azraelius in "master and margarita" devil was also good, but all guests on his ball were muderers and they all came from hell. in same novel devil have said that necromancy is a black magic. so its no matter are u good or bad but good and evil is just two polarirtys so if you are lich you are on evil side even you performing good stuff